thats your imaginary world im talking about, not mine.
exactly - my world's not in the least bit perfect, i didn't say it was, i grew up in 70s 80's and 90's London, I also went to school with people affected by the riots, there was nothing perfect & thug free about it.
Last edited by Alien5; 04-08-2008 at 01:52 PM.
So the Tibetan chap running in front of the torch and happily waving his national flag at the camera who got jumped on by the policeman and had his flag removed was a victim of thuggery? No law against waving a flag that I am aware of and he wasn't interfering with the torch.
The BBC and Sky ran hours of coverage on the protests in London and the ongoing protests in Paris and San Fransisco are keeping the issue at the top of the news. This is not a bad thing is it?. Yes it should be peaceful but that doesn't mean the protesters should apologise for being there. I think most of us know what thuggery looks like and some middle aged chap making a political protest by making a grab for a torch isn't it. The twonk who threw an egg at Prescott a few years ago might be classed as a thug as indeed might be Prescott. Connie Huq was considerably more sorted and philosophical about it than you appear to be. Are you on a wind up or something?
Last edited by Biggles; 04-08-2008 at 02:11 PM.
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum
another idiotic regular hiding behind a second account are you? why do i bother?
go back to school and learn the difference between thugs and protesters!
No I only have this one account... I feel no need to hide anywhere.
Oh! And I know the difference, and I know that grabbing that torch in that way could constitute assault in law.
Maybe you should go and read something about protesting, you'd probably learn that the most effective protests are those that have been done with the absence of violence and with the absence of direct action... like grabbing a torch.
Bookmarks