Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Geezer Is Disabled.

  1. #11
    Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Age
    43
    Posts
    3,028
    Quote Originally Posted by chalice View Post
    The half-arsed, bedwards kinda issue I was tryna highlight was that there's a difference between the male member flacid and the male member rampant.

    Haven't we seen dormant John Thomas's posted in the past with nary a sideways glance.

    But as soon as some cunt puts a pair of googly eyes on said cawk, it's fucking get the fuck out of my living room time.

    Anyway, I'm talking bawls. Bed.

    Night night.
    We're not allowed to post pictures of cunts, at all. So it should be the same for dicks. They shouldn't be allowed to post either, I'm fed up reading villageshaman's posts.

  2. Lounge   -   #12
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    46
    Posts
    22,943
    That one pic would not typically warrant a "knee-capping", no. However, he was warned on three previous occasions about posting genitalia. One of the times, it was for the exact same two images.

    If he wants to ignore those warnings, he'll get an infraction.


    yo

  3. Lounge   -   #13
    Quote Originally Posted by callum View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by chalice View Post
    The half-arsed, bedwards kinda issue I was tryna highlight was that there's a difference between the male member flacid and the male member rampant.

    Haven't we seen dormant John Thomas's posted in the past with nary a sideways glance.

    But as soon as some cunt puts a pair of googly eyes on said cawk, it's fucking get the fuck out of my living room time.

    Anyway, I'm talking bawls. Bed.

    Night night.
    We're not allowed to post pictures of cunts, at all. So it should be the same for dicks. They shouldn't be allowed to post either, I'm fed up reading villageshaman's posts.

    what about drawings?
    "That was a great speech. If McCain wins, he'll owe it to Sarah Palin."
    "We're fucked. I think."

  4. Lounge   -   #14
    Guillaume's Avatar Kentish old lady BT Rep: +8BT Rep +8
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    6,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Skizo View Post
    One of the times, it was for the exact same two images.
    So, erm, posting two different pics would have been acceptable?

  5. Lounge   -   #15
    peat moss's Avatar Software Farmer BT Rep: +15BT Rep +15BT Rep +15
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Delta B.C. Canada
    Posts
    10,547
    Quote Originally Posted by JPaul View Post
    What
    That small ?



    Sorry guy's I'm having trouble with the quote button , weird . Not me the quote button .

  6. Lounge   -   #16
    Something Else's Avatar sex a wolf in a bag BT Rep: +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70BT Rep +70
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Addicted to placebos
    Posts
    11,863
    The auld one had a varied genetalia fetish.
    Now go away.

  7. Lounge   -   #17
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    46
    Posts
    22,943
    Well, look what the cat drug in....


    yo

  8. Lounge   -   #18
    chalice's Avatar ____________________
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    10,458
    I don't half talk shite when I'm pished.

    Re-reading the devastation, I now realise Geezer posted that cunt apple pic again, the one he was disabled for before, like.

    To be fair though, I kinda provoked him in the desktop thread. But fuck 'im anyways.

  9. Lounge   -   #19
    JPaul's Avatar Fat Secret Agent
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    16,867
    There's people posting front bottom pics in the sexy lady thread, I thought that wasn't allowed either. Not just lady gardens either, actual genitalia.

    Where's the consistency, it's like watching Scottish puntsphere referees ffs.

  10. Lounge   -   #20
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    46
    Posts
    22,943
    We try to be a bit lax in that thread. People tend to know what they're getting into upon entering it. Thus, posting pics with a small amount of frontal barely showing is hardly worth getting in a huff about.

    Geezer is posting close up, full frontal, genitalia. The exact same pics of which he was warned for prior. If someone else were to have posted them (some who hadn't been warned already) they would have been removed and the member PM'd with regard to the rules.

    There isn't much to compare here in my opinion.


    yo

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •